HomeInsightsIND Submission Checklist: 15 Critical Elements to Avoid Clinical Hold
Back to Insights
Regulatory Strategy

IND Submission Checklist: 15 Critical Elements to Avoid Clinical Hold

A clinical hold can delay your program by months or years. Learn the 15 most critical elements FDA reviewers look for in IND submissions and how to get them right the first time.

P
Peter Parsonson
Founder & Principal Consultant
October 28, 2024
10 min read

Why IND Quality Matters

Your Investigational New Drug (IND) application is the gateway to clinical trials in the United States. An incomplete or poorly prepared IND can result in:

  • Clinical hold: FDA can prevent you from starting or continuing clinical trials
  • Delays: Requests for additional information extend your timeline
  • Credibility damage: First impressions matter with FDA reviewers

The good news? Most clinical holds are preventable with proper preparation.

The 15 Critical Elements of a Successful IND

Section 1: Administrative Information

1. Form FDA 1571 - IND Application

  • Ensure all fields are complete and accurate
  • Verify authorized signature
  • Confirm commitment to conduct studies under IND regulations

2. Table of Contents

  • Comprehensive and properly paginated
  • Hyperlinked for electronic submissions
  • Matches actual content organization

Section 2: Introductory Statement & General Investigational Plan

3. Introductory Statement

  • Clear description of the drug substance
  • Therapeutic rationale and mechanism of action
  • Disease indication and target patient population

4. General Investigational Plan

  • Phased development plan for next 12 months
  • Rationale for proposed studies
  • Risk-benefit assessment for initial trials

Section 3: Investigator's Brochure

5. Investigator's Brochure (IB)

  • Current and version-controlled
  • Contains all relevant safety and efficacy data
  • Adequate for investigators to assess risk-benefit
  • Updated annually or when significant new information emerges

Section 4: Clinical Protocol(s)

6. Protocol Design

  • Clear objectives and endpoints
  • Appropriate patient selection criteria
  • Adequate safety monitoring plan
  • Stopping rules defined

7. Informed Consent

  • Addresses all required elements per 21 CFR 50.25
  • Written at appropriate reading level
  • Includes all known risks from preclinical data

Section 5: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC)

8. Drug Substance Information

  • Complete characterization
  • Manufacturing process description
  • Specification and test methods
  • Stability data supporting proposed clinical use

9. Drug Product Information

  • Formulation composition
  • Manufacturing process and controls
  • Container closure system
  • Stability data for proposed storage conditions

10. Placebo and Comparator Information

  • Matching placebo formulation if used
  • Sourcing and quality documentation for comparators

Section 6: Pharmacology & Toxicology

11. Pharmacology Studies

  • Primary pharmacodynamics (mechanism of action)
  • Secondary pharmacodynamics (off-target effects)
  • Safety pharmacology (CV, CNS, respiratory)

12. Toxicology Studies

  • Species selection justification
  • Single and repeat-dose toxicity
  • Duration adequate to support clinical trial length
  • Genotoxicity studies (Ames, chromosomal aberration)

13. ADME Studies

  • Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion data
  • Metabolite identification
  • Drug-drug interaction potential

Section 7: Previous Human Experience

14. Previous Clinical Data

  • All available human experience, including foreign data
  • Published literature
  • Safety database summaries

Section 8: Supporting Information

15. Environmental Assessment or Claim for Exclusion

  • Most Phase 1 studies qualify for categorical exclusion
  • Proper documentation required

Red Flags That Trigger Clinical Holds

Based on FDA's published data, the most common reasons for clinical holds include:

  1. Insufficient toxicology to support clinical dose and duration
  2. Inadequate safety monitoring in the protocol
  3. Manufacturing issues that raise product quality concerns
  4. Protocol design flaws that don't protect patient safety
  5. Unqualified investigators or inadequate oversight plans

Pre-IND Meeting: Your Secret Weapon

A Pre-IND meeting with FDA can prevent most clinical holds by:

  • Identifying potential deficiencies before submission
  • Clarifying FDA expectations for your specific program
  • Building reviewer relationships
  • Documenting agreed-upon approaches

The 30-Day Review Period

After IND submission, FDA has 30 calendar days to:

  • Place the IND on clinical hold, or
  • Allow the study to proceed (no formal approval—silence means go)

If FDA has concerns but doesn't issue a hold, you'll receive an information request. Respond promptly and completely.

How We Help Clients Avoid Clinical Holds

At Adelphi Biosciences, our IND preparation process includes:

  • Gap analysis: Identifying missing elements before submission
  • Pre-IND meeting strategy: Maximizing FDA alignment
  • CMC optimization: Ensuring manufacturing sections meet expectations
  • Protocol review: Strengthening safety monitoring plans
  • Quality control: Multi-level review before submission

Planning an IND submission? Contact us to discuss how we can help you avoid clinical holds and accelerate your development timeline.


References: 21 CFR Part 312, FDA Guidance for Industry: Content and Format of INDs for Phase 1 Studies

INDClinical HoldFDADrug DevelopmentCMCToxicology
Share this article

Ready to Accelerate Your Regulatory Strategy?

Let our experts guide you through the complexities of FDA and global regulatory requirements.